TE · Green Bay Packers
The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Tucker Kraft. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 1 for Tight End.
Kraft opened with six targets and 65 yards on 66 percent snaps, then saw three targets despite 98 percent participation before bouncing to eight targets on 76 percent snaps. The 17 total targets and 106 yards show real involvement, but the target swing is why stability remains only 66 despite a 97 efficiency component.
Player-specific analysis · Reviewed September 25, 2026 · Editorial policyManagers can buy the efficient young tight end without paying as if every high-snap game will produce targets. The key tension is that participation has been strong at times while target concentration has moved sharply.
Another six-plus-target game on 75-percent-plus snaps would make Week 3 more than a rebound. Full participation with three or fewer targets would preserve the role-volatility discount.
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Start as a useful tight end with a real ceiling, but roster contingency depth. Buy if the seller values him as a good young option rather than a locked elite target earner.
Hold at 25 because efficiency and age support liquidity. Sell only for a premium tight-end upgrade, a scarce quarterback, or a package that respects the current volume evidence.
Production is 95, efficiency 97 and market 97, while opportunity is 83 and stability 66. FairPlay sees strong conversion with less certain weekly concentration.
Kraft's Week 3 target total more than doubled Week 2 even though participation declined 22 points. That separation is why targets, not snaps alone, should drive the next decision.
The market values the youth and efficiency near the production input. Lower opportunity and stability show that snap participation has not yet become automatic target volume.
FairPlay value 5,990 · Overall rank #35 · Market proxy 97 · Production 95These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Tucker Kraft plus a 2027 first ↔ Trey McBride
McBride costs more because of a stronger volume foundation; the Kraft side retains age and a credible efficiency path.
Tucker Kraft ↔ a projected 2027 first
A rebuilder can prefer the pick; a contender should only move Kraft if it has a viable replacement at tight end.
He has converted targets well, but target totals moved six, three and eight while snaps also changed. Efficient production is clearer than a fixed weekly target floor.
Not conclusively. He played 98 percent of snaps, then saw eight targets in Week 3; the file shows volatility rather than a settled direction.
Tucker Kraft is age 25, which places the career-window input at 100th percentile for TEs.
Tucker Kraft carries a 97th percentile market signal and ranks #35 overall. The gap between market demand and on-field production is small, so the two signals broadly agree.
Within the complete TE pool, production grades at 95th percentile, opportunity at 83th percentile, and efficiency at 97th percentile. Superflex position scarcity is applied separately.
Percentiles compare Tucker Kraft with the complete current TE pool. They explain the published value; they are not separate fantasy-point projections.
Career window is the strongest part of Tucker Kraft’s current profile at 100th percentile. Draft capital is the clearest source of downside at 57th percentile. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.
Comparable values to guide your offers.
Start with Tucker Kraft in the dedicated Superflex calculator, then add the other side of the offer.