WR · Detroit Lions
The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Jameson Williams. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 2 for Wide Receiver.
Williams increased from 84 to 97 percent of snaps, but targets fell from nine to four and air-yard share from 61.4 to 14.8 percent. Full-time participation is a positive; the opportunity became much less valuable. The model's high efficiency component cannot create a stable floor without repeatable targets.
Player-specific analysis · Reviewed September 25, 2026 · Editorial policyContenders can hold for spike weeks but need steadier receivers around him. Rebuilders should retain the age-25 asset when the market discounts the full-time role, or sell when another manager prices the Week 1 air-yard share as permanent.
Six-plus targets, downfield share and red-zone use are the key evidence. Playing nearly every snap with four low-value targets supports access, not a reliable ceiling.
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Use as an upside flex rather than the only WR2. Buy if the cost reflects volatility and the roster can absorb quiet weeks.
Hold while full-time snaps preserve upside. Sell for a more stable young target earner or premium pick when the league pays for explosive potential.
Market demand is 98 and efficiency 94, while opportunity is 82 and production 88. FairPlay sees a valuable ceiling with less volume insulation than the price leaders.
Williams played 63 snaps in Week 2 but caught two passes for 33 yards. Week 1's nine targets and 61-percent air-yard share did not repeat despite even greater participation.
The market leads production by ten points. Efficiency history and full-time snaps justify some premium; falling target concentration keeps the weekly range wide.
FairPlay value 5,431 · Overall rank #47 · Market proxy 98 · Production 88These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Jameson Williams plus an adjustment ↔ Tee Higgins
Williams has full snaps and field-stretching upside; Higgins has better early target concentration. The add buys floor.
Jameson Williams ↔ Emeka Egbuka plus an adjustment
Williams has stronger production proof; Egbuka is younger with his own target-quality swing. The adjustment should reflect evidence.
They create access, but four targets and a large air-yard-share decline keep the weekly floor uncertain.
Repeatable six-plus target games with downfield or red-zone value would connect his snap role to fantasy opportunity.
Jameson Williams is age 25, which places the career-window input at 94th percentile for WRs.
Jameson Williams carries a 98th percentile market signal and ranks #47 overall. The gap between market demand and on-field production is positive, meaning dynasty demand currently runs ahead of the production input.
Within the complete WR pool, production grades at 88th percentile, opportunity at 82th percentile, and efficiency at 94th percentile. Superflex position scarcity is applied separately.
Percentiles compare Jameson Williams with the complete current WR pool. They explain the published value; they are not separate fantasy-point projections.
Market demand is the strongest part of Jameson Williams’s current profile at 98th percentile. Opportunity is the clearest source of downside at 82th percentile. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.
Comparable values to guide your offers.
Start with Jameson Williams in the dedicated Superflex calculator, then add the other side of the offer.