The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Ted Hurst III. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 3 for Wide Receiver.
Observation onlyData-driven analysis
FairPlay editorial
Ted Hurst III's week 9 1 targets: what the latest row shows
Ted Hurst III is a 22-year-old wide receiver in FairPlay's starter tier at rank #120, with a value of 2,960. For Tampa Bay against Chicago, Week 9 1 targets matched the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. Week 7: 1 target, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 56% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. Week 8: 1 target, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 42% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. Week 9: 1 target, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 1% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. The roster snapshot lists Active, which is an administrative status and not a promise of future volume.
Generated from FairPlay and nflverse data · Reviewed November 6, 2026 · Editorial policy
roster status support and draft capital risk
FairPlay's elite market proxy (92) is above its usable production input (79). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price. roster status is near the model ceiling; opportunity is the next strongest input. draft capital is limited, which keeps the recommendation conditional.
Tampa Bay against Chicago: can week 9 1 targets hold for this very early-career wide receiver?
The next usable row for Tampa Bay against Chicago needs to show whether week 9 1 targets was a one-week result or part of a stable role. Watch targets and yards per target.
Roster-specific plan
very early-career wide receiver with flat usage
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Contending roster
Win-now approach
A contender should buy or hold Ted Hurst III only if the available usage does not yet prove a weekly lineup edge and the receiving role upgrades an actual lineup spot. Compare the cost with an active peer before paying for a name, a past result, or an unverified role expansion.
Rebuilding roster
Long-term approach
A rebuilder can retain Ted Hurst III's younger wide receiver window, but should sell if an offer prices more certainty than 3-week observed sample supports. The market-over-production gap is the cleanest point to test a liquidity gain.
Negotiation edge
Best market move
FairPlay values Ted Hurst III at 2,960. FairPlay's market proxy sits ahead of its production input by 13 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.
Evidence file · November 6, 2026
Week 9 1 targets for Tampa Bay against Chicago
Week 7: 1 target, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 56% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. Week 8: 1 target, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 42% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. Week 9: 1 target, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 1% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. This is observed box-score usage and offensive-snap context only.
FairPlay's elite market proxy (92) is above its usable production input (79). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price.
FairPlay value 2,960 · Overall rank #120 · Market proxy 92 · Projected production input 79What changes the call
What would change the call on Ted Hurst III
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 9 would test whether Ted Hurst III's latest role is repeatable.
A material move in draft capital, currently the weakest scored input, would challenge the roster status-led thesis.
A narrowing or wider FairPlay market-proxy/production-model gap from the current 13 points would change the disagreement being priced.
Two deals to test
Ted Hurst III: calculator checks after week 9 1 targets
These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Same-position comparison
Ted Hurst III or Chris Bell for a lineup spot?
Ted Hurst III ↔ Chris Bell (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Chris Bell has an Active roster status and a usable local usage row. Compare each player's FairPlay value and current workload in the calculator. This page does not claim that the swap is even in an outside market.
Roster-build comparison
Would Jonah Coleman fit this roster better than Ted Hurst III?
Ted Hurst III ↔ Jonah Coleman (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Jonah Coleman is an Active running back with a usable local usage row. Compare the two values in the calculator, then decide whether the positional change helps this roster. No outside-market adjustment is asserted.
Player-specific FAQ
Ted Hurst III dynasty value questions
Does Ted Hurst III's steady target volume support the starter tier for a very early-career wide receiver?
For Tampa Bay against Chicago, Week 9 1 targets matched the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. FairPlay's strongest scored input is roster status (100), while draft capital is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.
Does week 9 1 targets justify the market-proxy lead for Ted Hurst III, a very early-career starter-tier wide receiver?
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 9 would test whether Ted Hurst III's latest role is repeatable. Separately, a material draft capital change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.
7-day trade value trend
7 days agoToday
Why this value
Career window
Ted Hurst III is age 22, with a career-window input score of 95/100 for WRs.
Market context
The search-rank proxy is 92/100. Production, opportunity and efficiency are projection-derived inputs, not measured NFL performance. Agreement among these inputs is not independent on-field confirmation.
WR value context
These WR projection inputs combine prior information; they are not observed NFL percentiles. Current-season weekly records are shown separately and do not change the published production window.
Player-specific inputs
Model value breakdown
Normalized model input scores, not probabilities. Projection-derived scores are estimates. They do not establish a measured NFL role, even when a separate current-season weekly record exists. The career-window and draft-capital scales are not empirical percentiles.
Sleeper search-rank proxy92/100
Projected production input79/100
Projected opportunity input95/100
Projected efficiency input74/100
Career-window input95/100
Draft-capital input56/100
Dynasty manager takeaway
Projected opportunity input is the strongest part of Ted Hurst III’s current profile at 95/100. Draft-capital input is the clearest source of downside at 56/100. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.