The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Mark Andrews. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 1 for Tight End.
Observation only
FairPlay editorial
Mark Andrews's week 5 6 targets: what the latest row shows
Mark Andrews is a 31-year-old tight end in FairPlay's starter tier at rank #120, with a value of 2,960. For Baltimore against Atlanta, Week 5 6 targets matched the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. Week 3: 5 targets, 3 catches, 24 receiving yards, 52% snaps, and 4.8 yards per target. Week 4: 6 targets, 5 catches, 27 receiving yards, 58% snaps, and 4.5 yards per target. Week 5: 6 targets, 4 catches, 28 receiving yards, 72% snaps, and 4.7 yards per target. The roster snapshot lists Active, which is an administrative status and not a promise of future volume.
Generated from FairPlay and nflverse data · Reviewed October 14, 2026 · Editorial policy
roster status support and draft capital risk
FairPlay's at the top end market proxy (96) and elite production input (93) are close. The value is not being pulled materially in one direction by that comparison. roster status is near the model ceiling; role stability is the next strongest input. draft capital is limited, which keeps the recommendation conditional.
Baltimore against Atlanta: can week 5 6 targets hold for this late-career tight end?
The next usable row for Baltimore against Atlanta needs to show whether week 5 6 targets was a one-week result or part of a stable role. Watch targets and yards per target.
Roster-specific plan
late-career tight end with flat usage
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Contending roster
Win-now approach
A contender should treat Mark Andrews as a lineup purchase only when the recent workload helps a real starting decision and the tight-end edge exceeds a cheaper active alternative. Do not use the current profile to assume routes, targets, or a guaranteed scoring outcome.
Rebuilding roster
Long-term approach
A rebuilder should shop Mark Andrews for draft liquidity or a younger asset when another roster values the current tier more than the remaining career window. 3-week observed sample is a reason to set a bounded price, not to wait for an invented future role.
Negotiation edge
Best market move
FairPlay values Mark Andrews at 2,960. FairPlay's market proxy and production input are close by 3 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.
Evidence file · October 14, 2026
Week 5 6 targets for Baltimore against Atlanta
Week 3: 5 targets, 3 catches, 24 receiving yards, 52% snaps, and 4.8 yards per target. Week 4: 6 targets, 5 catches, 27 receiving yards, 58% snaps, and 4.5 yards per target. Week 5: 6 targets, 4 catches, 28 receiving yards, 72% snaps, and 4.7 yards per target. This is observed box-score usage and offensive-snap context only.
FairPlay's at the top end market proxy (96) and elite production input (93) are close. The value is not being pulled materially in one direction by that comparison.
FairPlay value 2,960 · Overall rank #120 · Market proxy 96 · Production 93What changes the call
What would change the call on Mark Andrews
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 5 would test whether Mark Andrews's latest role is repeatable.
A material move in draft capital, currently the weakest scored input, would challenge the roster status-led thesis.
A wider split between the FairPlay market proxy and production-model input would change the currently aligned valuation case.
Two deals to test
Mark Andrews: calculator checks after week 5 6 targets
These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Same-position comparison
Mark Andrews or Pat Freiermuth for a lineup spot?
Mark Andrews ↔ Pat Freiermuth (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Pat Freiermuth has an Active roster status and a usable local usage row. Compare each player's FairPlay value and current workload in the calculator. This page does not claim that the swap is even in an outside market.
Roster-build comparison
Would Chris Godwin fit this roster better than Mark Andrews?
Mark Andrews ↔ Chris Godwin (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Chris Godwin is an Active wide receiver with a usable local usage row. Compare the two values in the calculator, then decide whether the positional change helps this roster. No outside-market adjustment is asserted.
Player-specific FAQ
Mark Andrews dynasty value questions
Does Mark Andrews's steady target volume support the starter tier for a late-career tight end?
For Baltimore against Atlanta, Week 5 6 targets matched the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. FairPlay's strongest scored input is roster status (100), while draft capital is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.
Would weaker limited draft capital outweigh near the model ceiling roster status for Mark Andrews?
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 5 would test whether Mark Andrews's latest role is repeatable. Separately, a material draft capital change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.
7-day trade value trend
7 days agoToday
Why this value
Career window
Mark Andrews is age 31, which places the career-window input at 68th percentile for TEs.
Market context
Mark Andrews carries a 96th percentile market signal and ranks #120 overall. The gap between market demand and on-field production is small, so the two signals broadly agree.
TE value context
Within the complete TE pool, production grades at 93th percentile, opportunity at 86th percentile, and efficiency at 77th percentile. Superflex position scarcity is applied separately.
Player-specific inputs
Model value breakdown
Percentiles compare Mark Andrews with the complete current TE pool. They explain the published value; they are not separate fantasy-point projections.
Market demand96%
NFL production93%
Opportunity86%
Efficiency77%
Career window68%
Draft capital56%
Dynasty manager takeaway
Market demand is the strongest part of Mark Andrews’s current profile at 96th percentile. Draft capital is the clearest source of downside at 56th percentile. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.