Start a trade

Mac Jones

QB · San Francisco 49ers

Back to rankings
Dynasty trade value 1,298
Dynasty rank#256out of all players
QB rank#44out of QBs
Age28years
7-day change-12-0.9%
No active availability flag

The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Mac Jones. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 2 for Quarterback.

Observation only
Data-driven analysis
Roster-specific plan

established quarterback with flat usage

The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.

Contending roster

Win-now approach

A contender should keep or acquire Mac Jones only when the available usage does not yet prove a weekly lineup edge and the roster still retains enough playable Superflex access. Do not pay the market-proxy premium without accepting the production gap.

Rebuilding roster

Long-term approach

A rebuilder should compare Mac Jones's current liquidity with a future pick or younger position asset before deciding to hold. The 2-week observed sample should determine the price floor; it does not forecast the next season.

Negotiation edge

Best market move

FairPlay values Mac Jones at 1,298. FairPlay's market proxy sits ahead of its production input by 23 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.

Evidence file · November 6, 2026

Week 9 0 attempts for San Francisco against Las Vegas

Week 2: 0 attempts, 0 passing yards, 2 carries, 15% snaps, and passing efficiency unavailable. Week 9: 0 attempts, 0 passing yards, 3 carries, 8% snaps, and passing efficiency unavailable. This is observed box-score usage and offensive-snap context only.

Observed usage

NFL Weeks 2 and 9

  • Week 2: 0 attempts · 0 pass yards · 2 carries · 15% snaps · -0.2 PPR
  • Week 9: 0 attempts · 0 pass yards · 3 carries · 8% snaps · -0.3 PPR
Market price vs model evidence

22-point market premium

FairPlay's solid market proxy (82) is above its limited production input (59). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price.

FairPlay value 1,298 · Overall rank #256 · Market proxy 82 · Historical production input 59
What changes the call

What would change the call on Mac Jones

  • A second verified row that materially changes attempt volume and passing efficiency from Week 9 would test whether Mac Jones's latest role is repeatable.
  • A material move in production, currently the weakest scored input, would challenge the roster status-led thesis.
  • A narrowing or wider FairPlay market-proxy/production-model gap from the current 23 points would change the disagreement being priced.
Two deals to test

Mac Jones: calculator checks after week 9 0 attempts

These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.

Same-position comparison

Mac Jones or Malik Willis for a lineup spot?

Mac Jones ↔ Malik Willis (calculator comparison, not a quote)

Malik Willis has an Active roster status and a usable local usage row. Compare each player's FairPlay value and current workload in the calculator. This page does not claim that the swap is even in an outside market.

Roster-build comparison

Would Jordan Mason fit this roster better than Mac Jones?

Mac Jones ↔ Jordan Mason (calculator comparison, not a quote)

Jordan Mason is an Active running back with a usable local usage row. Compare the two values in the calculator, then decide whether the positional change helps this roster. No outside-market adjustment is asserted.

Player-specific FAQ

Mac Jones dynasty value questions

Does Mac Jones's zero-volume row support a hold in the bench tier?

Mac Jones's latest usable row shows participation but no usable attempt volume. That is too little to establish a role. FairPlay's strongest scored input is roster status (100), while production is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.

Does week 9 0 attempts justify the market-proxy lead for Mac Jones, an established bench-tier quarterback?

A second verified row that materially changes attempt volume and passing efficiency from Week 9 would test whether Mac Jones's latest role is repeatable. Separately, a material production change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.

7-day trade value trend
7 days agoToday

Why this value

Career window

Mac Jones is age 28, with a career-window input score of 94/100 for QBs.

Market context

The search-rank proxy is 82/100 and the historical NFL production input is 59/100. These are separate model inputs, not verified trade prices or current-season performance.

QB value context

Historical production, opportunity and efficiency are normalized within the QB statistical group. The market proxy uses the full player pool; career-window and draft-capital inputs use their own scales.

Player-specific inputs

Model value breakdown

Normalized model input scores, not probabilities. The production model uses completed 2020–2025 NFL seasons. The current-season usage file is a separate evidence layer. The career-window and draft-capital scales are not empirical percentiles.

Sleeper search-rank proxy82/100
Historical NFL production input59/100
Historical NFL opportunity input64/100
Historical NFL efficiency input62/100
Career-window input94/100
Draft-capital input90/100
Dynasty manager takeaway

Career-window input is the strongest part of Mac Jones’s current profile at 94/100. Historical NFL production input is the clearest source of downside at 59/100. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.

Fair trade range

Comparable values to guide your offers.

Myles MontgomeryRB · NE · Rank #2551,304
Henry RuggsWR · FA · Rank #2571,291
Evan EngramTE · DEN · Rank #2541,310

See if your trade is fair

Start with Mac Jones in the dedicated Superflex calculator, then add the other side of the offer.

Build a Superflex trade