TE · Denver Broncos
The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Evan Engram. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 1 for Tight End.
Evan Engram is a 32-year-old tight end in FairPlay's bench tier at rank #254, with a value of 1,310. For Denver against Carolina, Week 9 5 targets rose from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. Week 7: 3 targets, 1 catch, 2 receiving yards, 39% snaps, and 0.7 yards per target. Week 8: 3 targets, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 48% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. Week 9: 5 targets, 4 catches, 33 receiving yards, 51% snaps, and 6.6 yards per target. The roster snapshot lists Active, which is an administrative status and not a promise of future volume.
Generated from FairPlay and nflverse data · Reviewed November 6, 2026 · Editorial policyFairPlay's above average production input (86) is above its usable market proxy (77). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price. roster status is near the model ceiling; opportunity is the next strongest input. efficiency is very low, which keeps the recommendation conditional.
The next usable row for Denver against Carolina needs to show whether week 9 5 targets was a one-week result or part of a stable role. Watch targets and yards per target.
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
A contender should treat Evan Engram as a lineup purchase only when the recent workload helps a real starting decision and the tight-end edge exceeds a cheaper active alternative. Do not use the current profile to assume routes, targets, or a guaranteed scoring outcome.
A rebuilder should shop Evan Engram for draft liquidity or a younger asset when another roster values the current tier more than the remaining career window. 3-week observed sample is a reason to set a bounded price, not to wait for an invented future role.
FairPlay values Evan Engram at 1,310. FairPlay's production input sits ahead of its market proxy by 9 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.
Week 7: 3 targets, 1 catch, 2 receiving yards, 39% snaps, and 0.7 yards per target. Week 8: 3 targets, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 48% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. Week 9: 5 targets, 4 catches, 33 receiving yards, 51% snaps, and 6.6 yards per target. This is observed box-score usage and offensive-snap context only.
FairPlay's above average production input (86) is above its usable market proxy (77). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price.
FairPlay value 1,310 · Overall rank #254 · Market proxy 77 · Historical production input 86These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Evan Engram ↔ Mike Gesicki (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Mike Gesicki has an Active roster status and a usable local usage row. Compare each player's FairPlay value and current workload in the calculator. This page does not claim that the swap is even in an outside market.
Evan Engram ↔ Darnell Mooney (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Darnell Mooney is an Active wide receiver with a usable local usage row. Compare the two values in the calculator, then decide whether the positional change helps this roster. No outside-market adjustment is asserted.
For Denver against Carolina, Week 9 5 targets rose from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. FairPlay's strongest scored input is roster status (100), while efficiency is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 9 would test whether Evan Engram's latest role is repeatable. Separately, a material efficiency change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.
Evan Engram is age 32, with a career-window input score of 63/100 for TEs.
The search-rank proxy is 77/100 and the historical NFL production input is 86/100. These are separate model inputs, not verified trade prices or current-season performance.
Historical production, opportunity and efficiency are normalized within the TE statistical group. The market proxy uses the full player pool; career-window and draft-capital inputs use their own scales.
Normalized model input scores, not probabilities. The production model uses completed 2020–2025 NFL seasons. The current-season usage file is a separate evidence layer. The career-window and draft-capital scales are not empirical percentiles.
Historical NFL opportunity input is the strongest part of Evan Engram’s current profile at 95/100. Historical NFL efficiency input is the clearest source of downside at 35/100. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.
Comparable values to guide your offers.
Start with Evan Engram in the dedicated Superflex calculator, then add the other side of the offer.