TE · Atlanta Falcons
The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Kyle Pitts. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 1 for Tight End.
Pitts recorded one, three and two targets across three matched rows, catching two passes for 20 yards while playing 63, 38 and 59 percent of snaps. At age 25 he retains a valuable dynasty runway, but the current usage file does not support pricing him as a target-concentrated TE starter.
Player-specific analysis · Reviewed September 25, 2026 · Editorial policyProduction 92 and opportunity 96 in the model are much stronger than the 69 efficiency component. That tension fits the on-field file: potential and age remain, while conversion and recurring targets require proof.
Five or more targets on a 60-percent-plus snap game would be a meaningful improvement. Another low-target row, especially with full participation, would keep the profile dependent on projection rather than current role.
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Use Pitts as bench depth or a matchup bet, not a weekly tight-end solution. Buy only if the manager discounts the name-value gap to the current two-catch evidence.
Hold if your timeline permits volatility, because he is still 25. Sell when another manager pays for the historical ceiling rather than the current target footprint.
Market is 97, age is 100 and opportunity is 96; efficiency is 69. FairPlay sees a broad outcome range rather than a settled elite role.
Pitts' highest participation row produced one target, while the three-target row came on 38 percent snaps. Neither row creates a reliable connection between being active and earning volume.
The market still prices age and ceiling above the current usage. The model's efficiency discount explains why a name-based premium needs a real target test before it expands.
FairPlay value 5,798 · Overall rank #39 · Market proxy 97 · Production 92These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Kyle Pitts plus a 2027 third ↔ David Njoku
Njoku offers the current-use case; Pitts offers age and upside. The add should be small because both retain outcome volatility.
Kyle Pitts plus a future second ↔ Dalton Kincaid
Kincaid's current target file is stronger. The second reflects the difference in present evidence, not an assumption that Pitts cannot rebound.
Age 25 and a strong market/model profile retain dynasty optionality, but those facts do not convert six targets into proven current production.
They should not pay a target-dominant tight-end price until participation and target volume align in the matched usage data.
Kyle Pitts is age 26, which places the career-window input at 94th percentile for TEs.
Kyle Pitts carries a 97th percentile market signal and ranks #39 overall. The gap between market demand and on-field production is small, so the two signals broadly agree.
Within the complete TE pool, production grades at 92th percentile, opportunity at 96th percentile, and efficiency at 69th percentile. Superflex position scarcity is applied separately.
Percentiles compare Kyle Pitts with the complete current TE pool. They explain the published value; they are not separate fantasy-point projections.
Market demand is the strongest part of Kyle Pitts’s current profile at 97th percentile. Efficiency is the clearest source of downside at 69th percentile. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.
Comparable values to guide your offers.
Start with Kyle Pitts in the dedicated Superflex calculator, then add the other side of the offer.