QB · Detroit Lions
The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Jared Goff. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 1 for Quarterback.
Goff played every snap and attempted 39 and 38 passes, then turned Week 2 into 327 yards and 29.8 PPR points. His stability component is the strongest possible part of the profile. Because rushing contributes little, the high-end outcome remains dependent on passing volume and red-zone efficiency.
Player-specific analysis · Reviewed September 25, 2026 · Editorial policyContenders can value him as a reliable QB2 and avoid paying the premium attached to more volatile dual-threat ceilings. Rebuilders should demand full starter value because the role is secure and Superflex replacements are scarce.
Monitor attempt volume, pressure protection and touchdown conversion. When those remain healthy, modest rushing is a ceiling limitation rather than a threat to the weekly floor.
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Hold and start him. Buying with a late first plus a lesser quarterback can be reasonable if it removes a weekly lineup weakness, but do not price him like a top-five dual-threat option.
Sell only when the return contains either a younger starting quarterback or premium capital. Stability has value to rebuilding teams too because it remains liquid during the season.
The market proxy leads production, but perfect stability explains much of the premium. A downgrade requires weaker efficiency across sustained volume, not one interception-heavy game.
Goff handled every offensive snap in both games and stayed near 40 attempts. Passing yardage rose from 206 to 327, showing how efficiency changes the ceiling within an otherwise stable role.
Market demand is about eleven points above production, while stability is at the top of the scale. FairPlay pays for starter certainty but stops short of an elite price because the rushing lever is limited.
FairPlay value 3,782 · Overall rank #88 · Market proxy 97 · Production 87These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Daniel Jones plus a future second ↔ Jared Goff
The contender pays for stability. The Goff manager should ask for more if Jones' starting path is not equally secure.
Jared Goff plus a first ↔ C.J. Stroud
The younger side offers insulation, not guaranteed weekly superiority. Check whether the additional first damages the rebuild more than the age gain helps it.
He can score like one in efficient high-volume weeks, but limited rushing keeps his long-term model ceiling below the most insulated dual-threat quarterbacks.
They can. Stable starting quarterbacks remain liquid; sell only when the return improves age insulation or draft-capital flexibility.
Jared Goff is age 31, which places the career-window input at 77th percentile for QBs.
Jared Goff carries a 97th percentile market signal and ranks #88 overall. The gap between market demand and on-field production is positive, meaning dynasty demand currently runs ahead of the production input.
Within the complete QB pool, production grades at 87th percentile, opportunity at 89th percentile, and efficiency at 54th percentile. Superflex position scarcity is applied separately.
Percentiles compare Jared Goff with the complete current QB pool. They explain the published value; they are not separate fantasy-point projections.
Market demand is the strongest part of Jared Goff’s current profile at 97th percentile. Efficiency is the clearest source of downside at 54th percentile. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.
Comparable values to guide your offers.
Start with Jared Goff in the dedicated Superflex calculator, then add the other side of the offer.