Questionable · Ribs. Sleeper player record updated Nov 5, 8:55 PM UTC. nflverse depth rank: 1 (Wide Receiver).
Structured status · higher confidence · Fresh within the seven-day observation window.
Does not change valueData-driven analysis
FairPlay editorial
Michael Wilson's week 9 7 targets: what the latest row shows
Michael Wilson is a 26-year-old wide receiver in FairPlay's starter tier at rank #127, with a value of 2,820. For Arizona against Seattle, Week 9 7 targets fell from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. Week 7: 8 targets, 4 catches, 55 receiving yards, 90% snaps, and 6.9 yards per target. Week 8: 15 targets, 8 catches, 111 receiving yards, 79% snaps, and 7.4 yards per target. Week 9: 7 targets, 6 catches, 60 receiving yards, 83% snaps, and 8.6 yards per target. The roster snapshot lists Active, which is an administrative status and not a promise of future volume.
Generated from FairPlay and nflverse data · Reviewed November 6, 2026 · Editorial policy
roster status support and draft capital risk
FairPlay's near the model ceiling market proxy (97) is above its above average production input (84). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price. roster status is near the model ceiling; market proxy is the next strongest input. draft capital is limited, which keeps the recommendation conditional.
Arizona against Seattle: can week 9 7 targets hold for this established wide receiver?
The next usable row for Arizona against Seattle needs to show whether week 9 7 targets was a one-week result or part of a stable role. Watch targets and yards per target.
Roster-specific plan
established wide receiver with falling usage
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Contending roster
Win-now approach
A contender should buy or hold Michael Wilson only if the recent workload helps a real starting decision and the receiving role upgrades an actual lineup spot. Compare the cost with an active peer before paying for a name, a past result, or an unverified role expansion.
Rebuilding roster
Long-term approach
A rebuilder should compare Michael Wilson's current liquidity with a future pick or younger position asset before deciding to hold. The 3-week observed sample should determine the price floor; it does not forecast the next season.
Negotiation edge
Best market move
FairPlay values Michael Wilson at 2,820. FairPlay's market proxy sits ahead of its production input by 13 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.
Evidence file · November 6, 2026
Week 9 7 targets for Arizona against Seattle
Week 7: 8 targets, 4 catches, 55 receiving yards, 90% snaps, and 6.9 yards per target. Week 8: 15 targets, 8 catches, 111 receiving yards, 79% snaps, and 7.4 yards per target. Week 9: 7 targets, 6 catches, 60 receiving yards, 83% snaps, and 8.6 yards per target. This is observed box-score usage and offensive-snap context only.
FairPlay's near the model ceiling market proxy (97) is above its above average production input (84). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price.
FairPlay value 2,820 · Overall rank #127 · Market proxy 97 · Historical production input 84What changes the call
What would change the call on Michael Wilson
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 9 would test whether Michael Wilson's latest role is repeatable.
A material move in draft capital, currently the weakest scored input, would challenge the roster status-led thesis.
A narrowing or wider FairPlay market-proxy/production-model gap from the current 13 points would change the disagreement being priced.
Two deals to test
Michael Wilson: calculator checks after week 9 7 targets
These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Same-position comparison
Michael Wilson or Tank Dell for a lineup spot?
Michael Wilson ↔ Tank Dell (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Tank Dell has an Active roster status and a usable local usage row. Compare each player's FairPlay value and current workload in the calculator. This page does not claim that the swap is even in an outside market.
Roster-build comparison
Would Chase Brown fit this roster better than Michael Wilson?
Michael Wilson ↔ Chase Brown (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Chase Brown is an Active running back with a usable local usage row. Compare the two values in the calculator, then decide whether the positional change helps this roster. No outside-market adjustment is asserted.
Player-specific FAQ
Michael Wilson dynasty value questions
Does Michael Wilson's falling target volume support the starter tier for an established wide receiver?
For Arizona against Seattle, Week 9 7 targets fell from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. FairPlay's strongest scored input is roster status (100), while draft capital is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.
Does week 9 7 targets justify the market-proxy lead for Michael Wilson, an established starter-tier wide receiver?
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 9 would test whether Michael Wilson's latest role is repeatable. Separately, a material draft capital change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.
7-day trade value trend
7 days agoToday
Why this value
Career window
Michael Wilson is age 26, with a career-window input score of 88/100 for WRs.
Market context
The search-rank proxy is 97/100 and the historical NFL production input is 84/100. These are separate model inputs, not verified trade prices or current-season performance.
WR value context
Historical production, opportunity and efficiency are normalized within the WR statistical group. The market proxy uses the full player pool; career-window and draft-capital inputs use their own scales.
Player-specific inputs
Model value breakdown
Normalized model input scores, not probabilities. The production model uses completed 2020–2025 NFL seasons. The current-season usage file is a separate evidence layer. The career-window and draft-capital scales are not empirical percentiles.
Sleeper search-rank proxy97/100
Historical NFL production input84/100
Historical NFL opportunity input85/100
Historical NFL efficiency input61/100
Career-window input88/100
Draft-capital input54/100
Dynasty manager takeaway
Sleeper search-rank proxy is the strongest part of Michael Wilson’s current profile at 97/100. Draft-capital input is the clearest source of downside at 54/100. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.