The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Michael Penix Jr.. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 1 for Quarterback.
Observation onlyData-driven analysis
FairPlay editorial
Michael Penix Jr.'s week 9 31 attempts: what the latest row shows
Michael Penix Jr. is a 26-year-old quarterback in FairPlay's depth tier at rank #204, with a value of 1,668. For Atlanta against Cincinnati, Week 9 31 attempts rose from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. Week 7: 34 attempts, 213 passing yards, 5 carries, 100% snaps, and 6.3 yards per attempt. Week 8: 24 attempts, 125 passing yards, 5 carries, 100% snaps, and 5.2 yards per attempt. Week 9: 31 attempts, 162 passing yards, 3 carries, 100% snaps, and 5.2 yards per attempt. The roster snapshot lists Active, which is an administrative status and not a promise of future volume.
Generated from FairPlay and nflverse data · Reviewed November 6, 2026 · Editorial policy
roster status support and efficiency risk
FairPlay's elite market proxy (91) is above its uncertain production input (62). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price. roster status is near the model ceiling; career window is the next strongest input. efficiency is limited, which keeps the recommendation conditional.
Atlanta against Cincinnati: can week 9 31 attempts hold for this developing quarterback?
The next usable row for Atlanta against Cincinnati needs to show whether week 9 31 attempts was a one-week result or part of a stable role. Watch attempts and passing efficiency.
Roster-specific plan
developing quarterback with rising usage
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Contending roster
Win-now approach
A contender should keep or acquire Michael Penix Jr. only when the recent workload helps a real starting decision and the roster still retains enough playable Superflex access. Do not pay the market-proxy premium without accepting the production gap.
Rebuilding roster
Long-term approach
A rebuilder can retain Michael Penix Jr.'s younger quarterback window, but should sell if an offer prices more certainty than 3-week observed sample supports. The market-over-production gap is the cleanest point to test a liquidity gain.
Negotiation edge
Best market move
FairPlay values Michael Penix Jr. at 1,668. FairPlay's market proxy sits ahead of its production input by 29 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.
Evidence file · November 6, 2026
Week 9 31 attempts for Atlanta against Cincinnati
Week 7: 34 attempts, 213 passing yards, 5 carries, 100% snaps, and 6.3 yards per attempt. Week 8: 24 attempts, 125 passing yards, 5 carries, 100% snaps, and 5.2 yards per attempt. Week 9: 31 attempts, 162 passing yards, 3 carries, 100% snaps, and 5.2 yards per attempt. This is observed box-score usage and offensive-snap context only.
FairPlay's elite market proxy (91) is above its uncertain production input (62). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price.
FairPlay value 1,668 · Overall rank #204 · Market proxy 91 · Historical production input 62What changes the call
What would change the call on Michael Penix Jr.
A second verified row that materially changes attempt volume and passing efficiency from Week 9 would test whether Michael Penix Jr.'s latest role is repeatable.
A material move in efficiency, currently the weakest scored input, would challenge the roster status-led thesis.
A narrowing or wider FairPlay market-proxy/production-model gap from the current 29 points would change the disagreement being priced.
Two deals to test
Michael Penix Jr.: calculator checks after week 9 31 attempts
These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Same-position comparison
Michael Penix Jr. or Justin Fields for a lineup spot?
Michael Penix Jr. ↔ Justin Fields (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Justin Fields has an Active roster status and a usable local usage row. Compare each player's FairPlay value and current workload in the calculator. This page does not claim that the swap is even in an outside market.
Roster-build comparison
Would Rashod Bateman fit this roster better than Michael Penix Jr.?
Michael Penix Jr. ↔ Rashod Bateman (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Rashod Bateman is an Active wide receiver with a usable local usage row. Compare the two values in the calculator, then decide whether the positional change helps this roster. No outside-market adjustment is asserted.
Player-specific FAQ
Michael Penix Jr. dynasty value questions
Does Michael Penix Jr.'s rising passing volume support the depth tier for a developing quarterback?
For Atlanta against Cincinnati, Week 9 31 attempts rose from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. FairPlay's strongest scored input is roster status (100), while efficiency is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.
Does week 9 31 attempts justify the market-proxy lead for Michael Penix Jr., a developing depth-tier quarterback?
A second verified row that materially changes attempt volume and passing efficiency from Week 9 would test whether Michael Penix Jr.'s latest role is repeatable. Separately, a material efficiency change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.
7-day trade value trend
7 days agoToday
Why this value
Career window
Michael Penix Jr. is age 26, with a career-window input score of 98/100 for QBs.
Market context
The search-rank proxy is 91/100 and the historical NFL production input is 62/100. These are separate model inputs, not verified trade prices or current-season performance.
QB value context
Historical production, opportunity and efficiency are normalized within the QB statistical group. The market proxy uses the full player pool; career-window and draft-capital inputs use their own scales.
Player-specific inputs
Model value breakdown
Normalized model input scores, not probabilities. The production model uses completed 2020–2025 NFL seasons. The current-season usage file is a separate evidence layer. The career-window and draft-capital scales are not empirical percentiles.
Sleeper search-rank proxy91/100
Historical NFL production input62/100
Historical NFL opportunity input63/100
Historical NFL efficiency input55/100
Career-window input98/100
Draft-capital input92/100
Dynasty manager takeaway
Career-window input is the strongest part of Michael Penix Jr.’s current profile at 98/100. Historical NFL efficiency input is the clearest source of downside at 55/100. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.