TE · Green Bay Packers
The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Mark Redman. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 2 for Tight End.
Mark Redman is a 24-year-old tight end in FairPlay's depth tier at rank #210, with a value of 1,620. For Green Bay against Detroit, Week 7 1 targets fell from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. Week 4: 2 targets, 2 catches, 29 receiving yards, 47% snaps, and 14.5 yards per target. Week 7: 1 target, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 25% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. The roster snapshot lists Active, which is an administrative status and not a promise of future volume.
Generated from FairPlay and nflverse data · Reviewed November 6, 2026 · Editorial policyFairPlay's high-end market proxy (87) is above its mixed production input (68). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price. roster status is near the model ceiling; career window is the next strongest input. draft capital is very low, which keeps the recommendation conditional.
The next usable row for Green Bay against Detroit needs to show whether week 7 1 targets was a one-week result or part of a stable role. Watch targets and yards per target.
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
A contender should treat Mark Redman as a lineup purchase only when the available usage does not yet prove a weekly lineup edge and the tight-end edge exceeds a cheaper active alternative. Do not use the current profile to assume routes, targets, or a guaranteed scoring outcome.
A rebuilder can retain Mark Redman's younger tight end window, but should sell if an offer prices more certainty than 2-week observed sample supports. The market-over-production gap is the cleanest point to test a liquidity gain.
FairPlay values Mark Redman at 1,620. FairPlay's market proxy sits ahead of its production input by 19 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.
Week 4: 2 targets, 2 catches, 29 receiving yards, 47% snaps, and 14.5 yards per target. Week 7: 1 target, 0 catches, 0 receiving yards, 25% snaps, and 0.0 yards per target. This is observed box-score usage and offensive-snap context only.
FairPlay's high-end market proxy (87) is above its mixed production input (68). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price.
FairPlay value 1,620 · Overall rank #210 · Market proxy 87 · Projected production input 68These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Mark Redman ↔ Gunnar Helm (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Gunnar Helm has an Active roster status and a usable local usage row. Compare each player's FairPlay value and current workload in the calculator. This page does not claim that the swap is even in an outside market.
Mark Redman ↔ Kyle Monangai (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Kyle Monangai is an Active running back with a usable local usage row. Compare the two values in the calculator, then decide whether the positional change helps this roster. No outside-market adjustment is asserted.
For Green Bay against Detroit, Week 7 1 targets fell from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. FairPlay's strongest scored input is roster status (100), while draft capital is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 7 would test whether Mark Redman's latest role is repeatable. Separately, a material draft capital change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.
Mark Redman is age 24, with a career-window input score of 98/100 for TEs.
The search-rank proxy is 87/100. Production, opportunity and efficiency are projection-derived inputs, not measured NFL performance. Agreement among these inputs is not independent on-field confirmation.
These TE projection inputs combine prior information; they are not observed NFL percentiles. Current-season weekly records are shown separately and do not change the published production window.
Normalized model input scores, not probabilities. Projection-derived scores are estimates. They do not establish a measured NFL role, even when a separate current-season weekly record exists. The career-window and draft-capital scales are not empirical percentiles.
Career-window input is the strongest part of Mark Redman’s current profile at 98/100. Draft-capital input is the clearest source of downside at 32/100. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.
Comparable values to guide your offers.
Start with Mark Redman in the dedicated Superflex calculator, then add the other side of the offer.