The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Mark Gronowski.
Observation onlyData-driven analysis
FairPlay editorial
No NFL sample for Mark Gronowski
Mark Gronowski is a 25-year-old quarterback in FairPlay's bench tier at rank #303, with a value of 1,034. Mark Gronowski has an NFL identity match, but no 2026 weekly usage row. Confirm current roster and usage coverage before assigning lineup value. No usable weekly workload is available. The roster snapshot lists Active, which is an administrative status and not a promise of future volume.
Generated from FairPlay and nflverse data · Reviewed November 6, 2026 · Editorial policy
What FairPlay's career window input can support
FairPlay's above average market proxy (86) is above its mixed production input (67). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price. career window is at the top end; market proxy is the next strongest input. roster status is very low, which keeps the recommendation conditional.
Verify Mark Gronowski's current-season participation
The model identity is present, but a current-season workload is not established. Check roster confirmation and usable current-season usage or snap evidence before treating a model ranking as a playable NFL role.
Roster-specific plan
developing quarterback without a usable sample
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Contending roster
Win-now approach
A contender should keep or acquire Mark Gronowski only when the available usage does not yet prove a weekly lineup edge and the roster still retains enough playable Superflex access. Do not pay the market-proxy premium without accepting the production gap.
Rebuilding roster
Long-term approach
A rebuilder can retain Mark Gronowski's younger quarterback window, but should sell if an offer prices more certainty than the missing weekly match supports. The market-over-production gap is the cleanest point to test a liquidity gain.
Negotiation edge
Best market move
FairPlay values Mark Gronowski at 1,034. FairPlay's market proxy sits ahead of its production input by 19 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.
Evidence file · November 6, 2026
No matched NFL usage row
Mark Gronowski has no matched row in the 2026 nflverse weekly file. FairPlay does not turn that absence into zero usage or a role forecast.
Observed usage
No verified 2026 weekly sample
The current nflverse weekly file contains no row for this player. FairPlay treats that absence as a limitation, not as zero usage.
Market price vs model evidence
Projection input comparison
FairPlay's above average market proxy (86) is above its mixed production input (67). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price.
FairPlay value 1,034 · Overall rank #303 · Market proxy 86 · Projected production input 67What changes the call
What would change the call on Mark Gronowski
A matched current-season nflverse row with actual attempt volume and passing efficiency would replace part of Mark Gronowski's current evidence boundary; it would not establish a first career appearance.
A material move in roster status, currently the weakest scored input, would challenge the career window-led thesis.
A narrowing or wider FairPlay market-proxy/production-model gap from the current 19 points would change the disagreement being priced.
Two deals to test
Mark Gronowski: roster choices without NFL usage
These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Roster-spot decision
Keep Mark Gronowski, the developing quarterback, for the career window and market proxy case, or open a priority bench spot?
Mark Gronowski: stash or drop decision
Because there is no matched NFL usage row, this is not a player-for-player trade quote. Keep the roster spot only if the upside case fits the roster and a more useful waiver or bench option is not available.
Comparison boundary
Test Mark Gronowski's career window-led model against a verified developing quarterback in the same priority bench while stress-testing roster status
No trade quote proposed for Mark Gronowski
FairPlay does not have verified external market pricing here. Use the calculator to compare the current model value with a roster-specific alternative, but do not treat this page as an outside-market quote.
Player-specific FAQ
Mark Gronowski dynasty value questions
Is Mark Gronowski, a developing quarterback, worth a priority bench spot when at the top end career window and above average market proxy lead but very low roster status is weakest?
Mark Gronowski has an NFL identity match, but no 2026 weekly usage row. Confirm current roster and usage coverage before assigning lineup value. FairPlay's strongest scored input is career window (95), while roster status is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.
Why does the market proxy hold a wide lead for Mark Gronowski, a developing priority bench quarterback, with above average market proxy next and very low roster status weakest?
A matched current-season nflverse row with actual attempt volume and passing efficiency would replace part of Mark Gronowski's current evidence boundary; it would not establish a first career appearance. Separately, a material roster status change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.
7-day trade value trend
7 days agoToday
Why this value
Career window
Mark Gronowski is age 25, with a career-window input score of 95/100 for QBs.
Market context
The search-rank proxy is 86/100. Production, opportunity and efficiency are projection-derived inputs, not measured NFL performance. Agreement among these inputs is not independent on-field confirmation.
QB value context
These QB projection inputs combine prior information; they are not observed NFL percentiles. Current-season weekly records are shown separately and do not change the published production window.
Player-specific inputs
Model value breakdown
Normalized model input scores, not probabilities. Projection-derived scores are estimates. They do not establish a measured NFL role, even when a separate current-season weekly record exists. The career-window and draft-capital scales are not empirical percentiles.
Sleeper search-rank proxy86/100
Projected production input67/100
Projected opportunity input61/100
Projected efficiency input59/100
Career-window input95/100
Draft-capital input32/100
Dynasty manager takeaway
Career-window input is the strongest part of Mark Gronowski’s current profile at 95/100. Draft-capital input is the clearest source of downside at 32/100. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.