The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Josh Downs. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 1 for Wide Receiver.
Observation onlyData-driven analysis
FairPlay editorial
Josh Downs's week 9 6 targets: what the latest row shows
Josh Downs is a 25-year-old wide receiver in FairPlay's starter tier at rank #141, with a value of 2,559. For Indianapolis against Dallas, Week 9 6 targets rose from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. Week 7: 4 targets, 2 catches, 18 receiving yards, 85% snaps, and 4.5 yards per target. Week 8: 5 targets, 4 catches, 23 receiving yards, 75% snaps, and 4.6 yards per target. Week 9: 6 targets, 3 catches, 24 receiving yards, 77% snaps, and 4.0 yards per target. The roster snapshot lists Active, which is an administrative status and not a promise of future volume.
Generated from FairPlay and nflverse data · Reviewed November 6, 2026 · Editorial policy
roster status support and efficiency risk
FairPlay's at the top end market proxy (95) is above its solid production input (82). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price. roster status is near the model ceiling; market proxy is the next strongest input. efficiency is low, which keeps the recommendation conditional.
Indianapolis against Dallas: can week 9 6 targets hold for this mid-20s wide receiver?
The next usable row for Indianapolis against Dallas needs to show whether week 9 6 targets was a one-week result or part of a stable role. Watch targets and yards per target.
Roster-specific plan
mid-20s wide receiver with rising usage
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Contending roster
Win-now approach
A contender should buy or hold Josh Downs only if the recent workload helps a real starting decision and the receiving role upgrades an actual lineup spot. Compare the cost with an active peer before paying for a name, a past result, or an unverified role expansion.
Rebuilding roster
Long-term approach
A rebuilder can retain Josh Downs's younger wide receiver window, but should sell if an offer prices more certainty than 3-week observed sample supports. The market-over-production gap is the cleanest point to test a liquidity gain.
Negotiation edge
Best market move
FairPlay values Josh Downs at 2,559. FairPlay's market proxy sits ahead of its production input by 13 points. Treat that as a model comparison, not a verified ADP or trade price.
Evidence file · November 6, 2026
Week 9 6 targets for Indianapolis against Dallas
Week 7: 4 targets, 2 catches, 18 receiving yards, 85% snaps, and 4.5 yards per target. Week 8: 5 targets, 4 catches, 23 receiving yards, 75% snaps, and 4.6 yards per target. Week 9: 6 targets, 3 catches, 24 receiving yards, 77% snaps, and 4.0 yards per target. This is observed box-score usage and offensive-snap context only.
FairPlay's at the top end market proxy (95) is above its solid production input (82). This is a FairPlay input comparison, not a verified external ADP or market price.
FairPlay value 2,559 · Overall rank #141 · Market proxy 95 · Historical production input 82What changes the call
What would change the call on Josh Downs
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 9 would test whether Josh Downs's latest role is repeatable.
A material move in efficiency, currently the weakest scored input, would challenge the roster status-led thesis.
A narrowing or wider FairPlay market-proxy/production-model gap from the current 13 points would change the disagreement being priced.
Two deals to test
Josh Downs: calculator checks after week 9 6 targets
These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Same-position comparison
Josh Downs or Parker Washington for a lineup spot?
Josh Downs ↔ Parker Washington (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Parker Washington has an Active roster status and a usable local usage row. Compare each player's FairPlay value and current workload in the calculator. This page does not claim that the swap is even in an outside market.
Roster-build comparison
Would Bryce Young fit this roster better than Josh Downs?
Josh Downs ↔ Bryce Young (calculator comparison, not a quote)
Bryce Young is an Active quarterback with a usable local usage row. Compare the two values in the calculator, then decide whether the positional change helps this roster. No outside-market adjustment is asserted.
Player-specific FAQ
Josh Downs dynasty value questions
Does Josh Downs's rising target volume support the starter tier for a mid-20s wide receiver?
For Indianapolis against Dallas, Week 9 6 targets rose from the prior usable row. The decision is whether that workload supports the current dynasty value. FairPlay's strongest scored input is roster status (100), while efficiency is the main limitation. The usage record can test that read but cannot verify an external price or future outcome.
Does week 9 6 targets justify the market-proxy lead for Josh Downs, a mid-20s starter-tier wide receiver?
A second verified row that materially changes target volume and yards per target from Week 9 would test whether Josh Downs's latest role is repeatable. Separately, a material efficiency change or a different market-proxy/production-model gap would require a new FairPlay read.
7-day trade value trend
7 days agoToday
Why this value
Career window
Josh Downs is age 25, with a career-window input score of 94/100 for WRs.
Market context
The search-rank proxy is 95/100 and the historical NFL production input is 82/100. These are separate model inputs, not verified trade prices or current-season performance.
WR value context
Historical production, opportunity and efficiency are normalized within the WR statistical group. The market proxy uses the full player pool; career-window and draft-capital inputs use their own scales.
Player-specific inputs
Model value breakdown
Normalized model input scores, not probabilities. The production model uses completed 2020–2025 NFL seasons. The current-season usage file is a separate evidence layer. The career-window and draft-capital scales are not empirical percentiles.
Sleeper search-rank proxy95/100
Historical NFL production input82/100
Historical NFL opportunity input85/100
Historical NFL efficiency input49/100
Career-window input94/100
Draft-capital input57/100
Dynasty manager takeaway
Sleeper search-rank proxy is the strongest part of Josh Downs’s current profile at 95/100. Historical NFL efficiency input is the clearest source of downside at 49/100. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.