Out · Shoulder - AC Joint. Sleeper player record updated Oct 12, 11:10 PM UTC. nflverse depth rank: 1 (Wide Receiver).
Structured status · higher confidence · Fresh within the seven-day observation window.
Does not change value
FairPlay editorial
Moore's Week 2 participation changed the entire profile
Moore opened with eight targets, 100 yards and a touchdown on 76 percent of snaps, then played 31 percent of snaps with no targets and one carry for minus-one yard. That is a material participation change. The public usage row does not explain why, so FairPlay treats it as uncertainty rather than inventing an injury or role demotion.
Player-specific analysis · Reviewed September 25, 2026 · Editorial policy
Verify context before buying the Week 1 ceiling
Contenders should confirm current availability and expected participation before trading. Rebuilders can use the Week 1 production baseline to seek younger assets, but should not accept a panic discount based on an unexplained single row.
Normal snaps are the first requirement
A return to 70-percent-plus snaps and target involvement would restore the contender case quickly. Another partial game, especially with official context, would require a larger stability discount.
Roster-specific plan
A productive veteran with an unresolved access signal
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Contending roster
Win-now approach
Hold until the participation picture is verified. Buy only after a first-party or matched statistical source confirms normal access; do not guess from the zero-target line.
Rebuilding roster
Long-term approach
Shop on any verified return to a full role because age 29 narrows the future window. Prefer one credible younger receiver or premium pick over multiple uncertain pieces.
Negotiation edge
Best market move
Market demand is 98 and model stability 100, but the current Week 2 row conflicts with that broader baseline. Production at 89 and age at 72 support value while making new evidence especially important.
Evidence file · September 25, 2026
Forty-four snaps became twenty-three and eight targets became zero
Moore's snap share fell 45 percentage points. The difference between 21.0 and minus-0.1 PPR points was not ordinary efficiency variance; access itself changed.
The market leads production by nine points and the broader stability score has not yet absorbed the observed Week 2 participation. Managers should wait for verified context instead of treating either week as normal.
FairPlay value 3,284 · Overall rank #105 · Market proxy 98 · Production 90What changes the call
Evidence required before the next Moore move
A verified return above 70% snaps with targets would restore the starting floor.
Repeated partial games would require a larger current-production discount.
Official availability or role information can explain the row; the box score alone cannot.
Two deals to test
Moore trades should wait for role clarity
These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Contender risk swap
Compare uncertain access with stable targets
DJ Moore plus an adjustment ↔ Terry McLaurin
Moore has the stronger Week 1 ceiling; McLaurin has two matched games. Verify both roles before setting the adjustment.
Rebuild exit
Move veteran volatility into younger runway
DJ Moore plus an adjustment ↔ Luther Burden
Burden has role uncertainty of his own but a longer age window. The add should reflect Moore's proven production history.
Player-specific FAQ
Moore's value after an unexplained partial game
Does DJ Moore's zero-target Week 2 make him a sell?
Not without context. The snap collapse is a real warning, but its cause and persistence must be verified before a major repricing.
What would restore Moore's contender value?
A normal-participation game with meaningful targets would show that Week 2 was not his new role baseline.
7-day trade value trend
7 days agoToday
Why this value
Career window
DJ Moore is age 29, which places the career-window input at 72th percentile for WRs.
Market context
DJ Moore carries a 98th percentile market signal and ranks #105 overall. The gap between market demand and on-field production is positive, meaning dynasty demand currently runs ahead of the production input.
WR value context
Within the complete WR pool, production grades at 90th percentile, opportunity at 87th percentile, and efficiency at 59th percentile. Superflex position scarcity is applied separately.
Player-specific inputs
Model value breakdown
Percentiles compare DJ Moore with the complete current WR pool. They explain the published value; they are not separate fantasy-point projections.
Market demand98%
NFL production90%
Opportunity87%
Efficiency59%
Career window72%
Draft capital89%
Dynasty manager takeaway
Market demand is the strongest part of DJ Moore’s current profile at 98th percentile. Efficiency is the clearest source of downside at 59th percentile. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.