TE · Philadelphia Eagles
The current Sleeper roster snapshot does not include an injury or practice designation for Dallas Goedert. nflverse lists the player at depth rank 1 for Tight End.
Goedert can still create a weekly tight-end advantage when he is on the field: Week 1 paired a 95 percent snap share with 77 receiving yards. Week 2 fell to 25 percent of snaps and four yards. That contrast makes route access, not career reputation, the central dynasty question.
Player-specific analysis · Reviewed September 25, 2026 · Editorial policyA contender should buy only at a veteran price that can be recovered through near-term starts. A rebuilder should use any healthy, high-route stretch to seek liquid draft capital or a younger tight end whose value is not concentrated in the present season.
Do not infer a medical cause from the usage file. Verify official availability reporting, then look for a return to normal route participation. A touchdown on limited routes would not resolve the underlying access problem.
The same player can require a different decision depending on your competitive window and the liquidity of the return.
Goedert is useful when the alternative is replacement-level tight-end scoring, especially in a lineup that can absorb missed weeks. Avoid paying a first-round pick or a young starter because the age-31 resale window is narrow.
Sell after a full-participation game rather than after the 25-percent snap result. A second-round pick or younger tight-end bet with a usable add-on is more aligned with a multi-year build.
Market and production inputs broadly agree, but that agreement is backward-looking. The next price move should follow verified snap normalization or a sustained reduction, not a guess about why Week 2 changed.
The first two weeks cannot be averaged into a normal role: 52 snaps and five targets in Week 1 became 19 snaps and two targets in Week 2. Managers need to treat those as two different usage states.
Production is slightly stronger than the market proxy, which creates a modest contender-buy case. Age and the Week 2 participation drop prevent the model from translating that efficiency into long-duration value.
FairPlay value 4,321 · Overall rank #73 · Market proxy 96 · Production 96These are negotiation scenarios calibrated to the current FairPlay tier, not promises that every league will price the assets identically.
Alec Pierce plus a future third ↔ Dallas Goedert
This works only if Goedert's participation is normal again and the receiver is expendable. It is a lineup trade, not a value-growth bet.
Dallas Goedert ↔ Hunter Henry plus a future pick
Use the pick to compensate for giving up the stronger current production profile; do not make the lateral swap without added liquidity.
Yes only after confirming normal participation and only at a veteran price. His value is the points above replacement during the current window.
No. It proves that his participation changed. The usage file cannot establish the cause, so the next full games and official status reporting matter.
Dallas Goedert is age 31, which places the career-window input at 68th percentile for TEs.
Dallas Goedert carries a 96th percentile market signal and ranks #73 overall. The gap between market demand and on-field production is small, so the two signals broadly agree.
Within the complete TE pool, production grades at 96th percentile, opportunity at 91th percentile, and efficiency at 89th percentile. Superflex position scarcity is applied separately.
Percentiles compare Dallas Goedert with the complete current TE pool. They explain the published value; they are not separate fantasy-point projections.
NFL production is the strongest part of Dallas Goedert’s current profile at 96th percentile. Career window is the clearest source of downside at 68th percentile. For trade decisions, compare that strength-and-risk mix with your roster timeline rather than relying on the overall value alone.
Comparable values to guide your offers.
Start with Dallas Goedert in the dedicated Superflex calculator, then add the other side of the offer.